Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Kgomotso Kupe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Pearl Kgomotso Kupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. As for "Who's Who Southern Africa", it is just a CV-hosting site, as evidenced by "Managing Your Profile", the first section in the FAQs. Edwardx (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Edwardx (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Beyond the promo concerns - SIGCOV is lacking. The article itself (despite the seemingly many refs - they lead back to much fewer sources (duplicates), many of which are not secondary RS) does not establish SIGCOV. My BEFORE (in which "Pearl Kupe" seems the main search term) doesn't establish SIGCOV.Icewhiz (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.