Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biodemographic Models for Reproductive Aging Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Biodemographic Models for Reproductive Aging Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Biodemographic Models for Reproductive Aging Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable research project or dataset. Created by COI account (declared) with no sources other than its own organization. The content appears to match that of https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/DSDR/studies/4452?q=aging&archive=DSDR# but it's possible that (due to the connection of the contributor) it is allowed by their employer/license-holder. DMacks (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Doesn't appear notable, and should be dynamited as there is nothing useful in the current article. It would need a total rewrite if it were to pass policy. It is currently just promotional nonsense that still strikes me as a copyvio. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete. No way a description of a single study - missing the results, weirdly - is a notable or encyclopedic topic. -Crossroads- (talk) 05:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.